[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

What makes people think this book is so good? I'm about

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1

File: image.jpg (55KB, 331x499px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
55KB, 331x499px
What makes people think this book is so good? I'm about 200 pages in, and though I admire Tolstoy's observational skills, and his way of creating very realistic scenes, there's not much else of merit that I can find in the book. Why do people say Tolstoy is up there with Shakespeare? His command of prose isn't even all that incredible, besides the convincing way he describes things. Though he makes the characters very lifelike, I can't help but think that there is a missing dimension to them. Can someone help explain this dude to me because I'm sure my opinion doesn't outweigh the much more informed opinion of scholars. I'm reading the Maude translation, not pic related.
>>
Finish it first. Then form your shitty opinions
>>
>>8583734
Who compared Tolstoy to Shakespeare? I've read War and Peace and most of Shakespeare's plays and unless you're rating art purely from the "morals" it conveys than no, in every single way Shakespeare is a better writer, though Tolstoy is great.
>>
>>8583756
>in every single way
Harold, man. You gotta stop this shit
>>
i read the opening 90 page tea party scene and decided life was too short
>>
>>8584355
People like you are the ones that come to Tolstoy threads and say that he is a bad writer or worse than Dostoievsky when in fact you have never even read him. Anyway: try to keep reading until you reach the Dolokov drinking mad partie. You will love it from there on.
>>
>>8584396

Is it okay if I think he's worse than Dostoevsky and I've read both?
>>
>>8583734
tolstoy is for chicks. dostoevksy is for real men with large salty balls,
>>
hurdygurdy
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 1


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.