So has anyone on /lit/ read or watched any of Jordan B Peterson's work and lectures? What did you think?
I've recently began watching his maps of meaning lectures and I've found it gratifying thus far and I find him intelligent and personable thus far. Is he the real deal?
Yes I've watched him. One of the more watchable intellectuals on youtube. Not insufferable in the slightest
>>8535625
>literally everything about this post
>Jungian psychology
Self-righteously making baseless inferences might have some type of therapeutic effect but it's no better than any other New Age approach to self-help besides the fact it can present itself as appearing a little more sophisticated.
>>8535634
What happened to the Penn frog anon?
>>8535634
Ah, the old "I don't understand it, therefore it's bullshit" argument
>>8535638
I didn't mean to frog post, srsly
>>8535643
Jungian "analysis" is the textbook definition of bullshit; but if you want a laugh try reading Dr. Frances Cress Welsing's The Isis Papers for some real good Jungian analysis and don't try to tell me she just applied the method wrong
>>8535586
like most people at u of t, he's a classist douche and has a more or less religious faith in IQ (that if you're sitting in a classroom at u of t, it's because you're a great person, and if you're not, it's because your not).
i guess nobody's perfect but this kind of bullshit isn't exactly an isolated incident coming from this guy. he's fun to watch but he's just a rhetorician.
>>8535998
Does his endorsement of IQ necessarily really mean he's classist?