Does anyone else here despair at the enormity of their "to

Im at the point where I want to reread books I haven't 3 years ago but I also have a huge backlog.

Better than having nothing to look forward to I guess

>>8531169
It wouldn't be so bad if I actually had a place to read in my house. I can only read for about an hour each night while in bed. And I'm a slow reader so it takes me about a week to get through a 280 page book.

File: death from laughter.png (63KB, 239x246px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 239x246px

>>8531169
>despair at the enormity of their "to read"
Why don't you just watch TV if it's too hard for you

Anyone have that comic of the guy trying to sleep and a figure looms over him and starts prattling off the things he hasn't read yet?

File: Top100lit2015memes.png (4MB, 1000x2390px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1000x2390px

im getting there

File: Jumping.jpg (435KB, 1193x1500px) Image search: [Google]

435KB, 1193x1500px

>>8531647
>too hard
That's a big assumption there m8. The despair comes from knowing that despite reading at least 100 pages a day, I'll never read every book that I want to. I wouldn't read if I didn't enjoy it

I don't get how anyone could despair over the knowledge that they'll likely never run out of books to read

Your whole approach to this hobby is off if you do

It kinda a pains me that there are books I set down and 10 years later the bookmark is still in the middle of them.
But that's just The Zeigarnik Effect.
I shouldn't be tormented about leaving something unfinished, I should be tormented that I don't know how the story ends. But I could care less about what happens, which means it's probably wasn't any good.

>enormity
Sorry I'm too busy WONDERING at the MAGNIFICENCE