>old genre fiction gets called "literature"
>my all-seeing eye when
so how long does it take for popular genre fiction to become a literary classic? 20 years?
That means Harry Potter will be eligible next year
>>8507252
Jesus fucking Christ, I can't believe it's that old.
>>8507231
>>old genre fiction gets called "literature"
Examples?
>>8507281
There has been a mild reaction against Stanislaw Lem recently by BTFO genre-fags (they probably opened his books after seeing him acclaimed here and couldnt hack his writing), with recent claims that he "doesnt know science" and "is boring". I guess the new claim is he is "literary because he iz old".
Other than that I can think of Tolkein, The Worm Ouroboros and The King in Yellow and I guess Lovecraft (although he obviously isnt literary).
>>8507319
>If it becomes a classic it isn't 'old genre fiction'.
Yes it is. Sherlock Holmes still belongs to the genre of detective fiction.
>>8507319
Lovecraft and LeGuin have Library of America editions, they most certainly count.
>>8507764
Coban Doyle didn't invent detective fiction.
>>8507898
Yep, that would be Poe
>>8507764
None of these invented the genre.
That would be Verne as far as I know.