So /lit/, if Nabokov read your novel, what would he say about it, or you as a writer?
Mine would probably go something like
>emotional drivel. Good ideas but poorly executed, like a child trying to write like a grown up. Maybe he would have done better if he'd tried again.
Your turn!
>>8485088
A wonderfully pellucid work! Translucent, lapidary, and effete. I shall now take out of your trousers the scepter of your passion to insert into my mouth and lovingly caress with my strong Germanic tongue.
>>8485088
>good ideas
nice humblebrag
your novel is shit
>>8485088
>like a child trying to write like a grown up
>like an anon trying to write like a Nabokov
>>8485094
>germanic tongue
I kekked
Mine would be something along the lines of gothic corncobbery or the sort, though I doubt I'm good enough to get as creative an descriptor as "corncobby"
>it's shit. i wish i could write this badly.
>>8485088
>this bruhbruh has read too much me
>what does Nabokov want?
Guy is a genius writer, but his opinions are worth less than a roll of used toilet paper
>>8485151
his synesthesia makes it so the 'colors' of the words have to be pleasing for him
probably why he had such a wide vocabulary
>>8485154
No, it's more than that, since he said stupid things like Shakespeare is a beautiful writer, but shouldn't be performed, only read
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TArNqebm_Gg
>>8485129
humbertbrag ftfy
>>8485088
>A nonentity. Means absolutely nothing to me.
What would Nabokov think of modern writers like DFW, Tao Lin and John Green?