http://youtube.com/watch?v=roxzqaq0IMs
Is he right?
he's wearing lennon's so i'm gonna have to go with no
Sums up this entire board pretty well.
It's sad really.
>>8484458
he needs a shave and a haircut. also, he's wrong. objectively.
What's a finnett?
>>8484458
post this shit on /a/ desu
>>8484958
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lq5GNDvtZ64
>>8484989
Nope, whenever he gets posted some autist carpetbombs the thread with gore and loli spam
>>8484458
i'll need to watch the video in order to form a proper stance on this, however at a glance I would say that he is wrong. my reason being that there is such a thing as an objective bad, therefore an objective good must exist.
>>8486107
What is an example of objective badness?
>>8484458
>>8485465
So fuck off and don't post him anywhere senpai. Why should we care for some basement dweller's opinion on objective good when we have our lord and savior Harold Bloom?
>>8486423
Everything presented in that strip is subjective. The fact that the straw man agrees on most of them doesn't change anything.
>>8486442
The only important thing to take away from that strip is it's better to listen to accomplished experts than the bandwagoning faggot with the occasional shitty individual opinion of his own
>>8486423
>art serves a practical purpose, like tables and food
>objectivists in a nutshell
>>8486442
so you are in denial of the fact that eating a well balanced diet with daily supersize will result in better health than eating candy and playing video games?
>>8486531
What constitutes good health is subjective.
>>8484458
What does lit think of this:
There probably aren't any objective truths, but there can be "human" truths -- what is good art, literature -- which we know only from "discovery" (though really more invention) over millennia.