Why is it fairly easy for some of us to dismiss the merits of

>>8469468
they aren't that simple, man. though the whole women rejection thing has some impact, of course, why not, it's part of their perception... but it's way more deep than just that.

>>8469485
I didn't understand your point. Would you do me the favor of elaborating on what you typed?

>>8469468
But it's not easy nor acceptable among people who seriously deal with truth. It's completely irrelevant how they lived their lives, what flaws they had, if what they say is true, is true.

>>8469497
their pessimism isn't based on women's rejection. though it might have something to do with it.

>>8469504
I'm not expressing that their pessimism is based on their rejection by women, but that it has contributed to their pessimism. A vast ordeal of causes had certainly contributed to their Pessimism, I believe we both agree on this point. What I'm truly asking here is why is it acceptable (and encouraged) to dismiss pessimistic views on women.

>>8469517
because you're shit at reading? nietzsche loves women too much; they're like the jews of the genders to him. schopenhauer's views on sexual satisfaction talk about how because ZOMGIT'SSOIMPORTANTRIGHTNOWISTICKMYDICKINANYTHINGWARMINCLUDINGMYHAND and the satisfaction it creates, we're terminally unhappy and locked into a cycle of abject need and base satisfaction.

>>8469539
How did you got to the conclusion that I'm shit at reading, anon?

>>8469544
because you think their views on women are where the pessimism gets real, when the pieces on women are some of the most kid gloved passages in both authors. at one point in "on women" schoppy literally pulls a "think of the women we have reduced to whores because we want something warm to put our dicks in on a cold london night".

Because being rejected by a woman and being so embittered by it as to write entire essays on the matter is far more pathetic than having a generally difficult life and a pessimistic outlook on such life.

no one does except for maybe some whiny retarded pseud bitches here

>>8469552
>because you think their views on women are where the pessimism gets real

I have never even implied this, anon. For me, his pessimistic views on Noise, Being, Women and Knowledge are all the same to me. I'm just curious on why most people dismiss a particular part of Pessimism.

>>8469562
Doesn't the fact that he throughout his whole life had problems with his mom, sister and passions constitute a difficult life?

>>8469581
>dismiss a particular part of Pessimism.
m8, they reject all forms of pessimism including that you're retarded and that's why your reading comp is so bad

>>8469591
Pessimists reject all forms of pessimism? Anon, you aren't making much sense. You should reflect more before expressing your thoughts.

>>8469599
no, most people do. look at what i'm quoting.

learn to write coherently

>>8469606
I should have made myself more clear. I'm referring to the Pessimists.

>>8469610
Please point out where I was incoherent.

>>8469612
those are still people.

>>8469621
Yes, anon. I believe that the primary substance of the "pessimists" is "man", that is, "people".

>>8469624
good, now when we add the modifier "most", as in "most people", to the idea that "most people reject all forms of pessimism", what did i mean by this?

>>8469629
I don't really understand why you're so bitter and passive-aggressive, anon. Have I done you wrong? Also, pessimists aren't most people - something you know, but you seems like you desperately try to save face for some reason I'm unaware of.

>>8469643
>someone might view me harshly
>but really i subscribe to the view everything should be viewed harshly
>bitter and passive-aggressive
>as an insult in a Shopping Hour thread
you're not even trying to pretend you read, anon, why shouldn't i treat you like the shit you are?

Because plebs dismiss anything they can't 'relate' to.

>>8469649
>but really i subscribe to the view everything should be viewed harshly
It's probably the third time you claim I expressed something that I didn't. I had hoped that you would eventually quit, but it seems that your bitter and sad soul keeps on pushing to these bad habits, anon. I'm sorry that you're like this. Have a good day, anon. I hope your life turns out ok!

>>8469661
>I WASN'T TALKING ABOUT PESSIMISM AT ALL PLS STOP BEING PESSIMIST NEAR ME
good as it gets really.

>>8469468
People tend to pick and choose. Plato was in favor of censorship, Aristotle didn't think women or slave races were equal to Greek men, and Mark Twain wrote an article about how he had sympathy for a poor beggar woman until he found out she was dating a black man

But everything else they did was good

Meanwhile we throw stones at HP Lovecraft and Wagner

your prose disgusts me kys

File: 1472036921747.png (247KB, 566x414px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 566x414px

can't even discuss controversial shit on /lit/ without some stuck up normies getting buttblastted

>>8470194
Who are the normies doe?

File: Nietzsche_Stirner_Marx.jpg (31KB, 400x298px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 400x298px

>>8469468
Because in the 1st case it"s the animal talking, in the 2nd case man.

>>8471502
Explain this image to me

>>8471541
Stirner keeps calling niggers "spooks" and Marx is going to culturally appropriate him.

Nietzshe dindu nuffin.

Such a buttblasted samefag in here

File: holes.jpg (92KB, 520x588px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 520x588px

>>8469468
Because that's the only argument women have.

File: 1472733599534.jpg (99KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 500x500px

This thread is retarded and OP should drink bleach.

You are implying we know about the token people you are referring to when you make these accusations.

Ofcoarse normies won't agree with woman hating, ofcoarse there are many who will cherry pick reading material for parts that will fit their narrative. Either you are asking a rhetorical question or you are a fucking idiot.

>>8470194
Accurate. I came in thinking this was going to be a decent thread, but it seems its already been derailed.

>>8469468
hegel cucked schoppy

anyway those kinds of books/sections about women are usually not philosophy and there's no philosophical argument in them. There's just shitty antropology, that's why people ignore them, not because the author was cucked

>>8471576
0/10
This is objectively a shitty post.

>>8469468
Schopenhauer was successful with women in real life

because that schopenhauer essay points out all your fawning over great achievements in art and science is just your attempt to screw someone you find beneath you for reasons that schopenhauer finds perverse.

>>8469468
Schopenhauer was a playboy. Luckily for him his only known child was a stillborn though.