Where do I move on from logicism? I have read TLP and Philosophical

File: Faggotry_forest.jpg (44KB, 300x355px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 300x355px

>someone on /lit/ actually reads

>>8460880
Well you could try 'The Principles of Mathematics'. I'm reading it at the moment. Russel has a rather dry style but it's interesting nonetheless.

enjoy, or whatever you do while reading, analyticfuck

http://pastebin.com/bf5fZE9b

https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/at/godel.htm

>>8460973
will look into these, thanks anon

>>8460897
>logicisim
Might want to reconsider

>>8460880
Just read "Sein und Zeit" and be done with philosophy once and for all. There's nothing to read after that.

>>8461335
There is more of a late Heidegger than there is a late Wittgemstein

>>8461335
why should i read a conty nazi when wittgenstein ended philosophy

>>8461346
I like to think they bioth contributed to end the nonsense that continental philosophy was. Now, thanks to them , humanity can put their gaze on the stars and the future.

Saul Kripke

>>8460880
Hey OP, how much logic did you have to learn to get through TLP? any recommendations for a textbook that would be good?

>>8460880
Honestly if you enjoy logic and Witty especially, just dabble in some set theory like Godel. It's not a philosophical bend at all, but I've found that it's similar in vein to logic and can give insight on several base philosophical paradoxes (namely Zeno's famous one)

>>8460880
>logicism
>Frege, Whiehead
>logic
>formal systems
>theory of language

You clearly fucking haven't read Philosophical Investigations

>>8461714
And you clearly only read a biased summary. Late Witty had positivist, logicistic etc. segments too and Tractatus had its fair share of idealism towards the end. There was a fucking interpretation war about Witty for a reason..

>>8462053
I wrote my MA thesis on Witt. You are pulling this out of your arse.