After browsing through some distasteful, some intellectual, some explicatory threads, is there anyone on here who doesn't, to sanity's relief, suck this woman's literary dick??
>inb4 yurr misogyny
>>8459515
she's aight
>not hungrily guzzling virginia's giant, throbbing literary dick, licking ravenously for a hope of a splurt of those transcendent juices
fampai literally WHAT are you doing with you life?
oh look, another retarded trying to make a bait thread, /lit/ is so original
>>8459515
There are no serious posters on /lit/ that dislike Wool's work. Most of us likely revere her as one of our favorite writers.
All the threads bashing her are entirely bait.
>>8459524
It's summer's last dying breath.
School soon! September's tomorrow!
>>8459515
lel
for a great writer big V is waaay too easy to imitate
>>8459524
Your defense of her well average work receiving more than same praise. Go.
>>8459546
>>8459515
I can't speak for the board, but Woolf is one of my favorite authors. Did you read anything by her or did you just "browse threads"?
If you haven't checked anything out yet, Orlando is a good place to start. Much easier to read than To The Lighthouse or Mrs. Dalloway and way ahead of its time in its exploration of gender identity. Also, the prose is absolutely beautiful.
>>8459532
>There are no serious posters on /lit/ that dislike Wool's work
Maybe not entirely true but she is easily one of the best 20th century authors. Right there with Faulkner or Joyce imo.