Explain what makes a book good.
Genre fiction is derided as lowbrow trash, and works like Ulysses or Gravity's Rainbow are held in high regard. Why? If you have to defend that difference, what exactly is it that makes that writing special? I've only heard people dismiss it as snobbery and personal preference and I want to know what the truth of the matter is.
>>8455388
P R O S E
R
O
S
E
>>8455402
What does that mean to you?
good prose style
thematic depth
literary innovation that isn't overly gimmicky
non-reliance on tropes
great characterization
>>8455441
Sounds reasonable. Let me see if I get this right:
>good prose style
Writing that isn't painfully eloquent for its own sake, but enjoyable to read and is both clever and colorful in its description of the events/place?
>thematic depth
The book's actual meaning, or implied meaning through allegory, that the author conveys about the human condition or some experience?
>literary innovation that isn't overly gimmicky
Trying something new in dialogue, plot or analogy?
>non-reliance on tropes
Avoiding the most common and predictable plotlines/characters/concepts that are constantly reused.
>great characterization
Fleshed out figures in the text that are engaging and not simplified cutouts?
bloom said these were good so i trust him
>>8455388
It is personal preference there is literally no good or bad book
>>8455388
At some point you just... feel it
Now, I'm entirely aware of the terms and the adjectives of literary criticism but at some point you can just feel when a book is bad. It's an intuition that most experienced readers have. That may sound like utter bullshit, and I can give concrete reasons, but at the risk of sounding pretentious I wanted to give maybe a bit of a different answer
>>8455507
I think I understand what you mean. I read Herbert's Dune, and also The Machine Crusade by his son, and the difference was immediate.
>>8455466
yes. especially with characterization. many times during stoner and catch 22 i felt such surges of emotion towards william and yossarian that i had to take a long pause and ruminate on their situations and what they could mean.
>>8455388
I feel that good books have this sort of intangible re-readability. It's hard to explain, but you kind of get the feeling that you know it's good when you read it. It's why a book might be considered a classic, for example. Even within genre fiction you've got some great work by authors like Asimov, for example.