ITT books that are the same no matter what order the chapters

>>8454680
I would argue there's a subtle but certainly extant intensification of the narrative that you'd lose

But for another example, Ulysses

How does that even work

>>8454680
The Bible.

My Diary t b h

The part with the real estate agent wouldn't make sense if it was before he moved out. And he becomes progressively more cruel as the book proceeds, so the pacing would be off.

>>8454687
But then that might not make sense because we'd be jumping around Bloom's day. Several of the key events in the book are so striking because of when they happen

>>8454680
BEE urself's books are all the same and they're all shit.

>>8454680
Naked Lunch by design, so it's a bit of a given but oh well I'll post anyway.

>>8455096
tfw you're right

Tropic of Cancer

>>8454680
The whole point is his descent into madness as the story goes along, the stark transitions between chapter topics are also pretty important. imo you'd lose a lot reading AP out of order

Rayuela, by Cortazar. Designed to be read in any order. It doesn't make sense anyway...

>>8454680
dubliners

you're wrong OP. BEE books always use steady repetition while constantly escalating the danger. Like a cold techno track. AP is the most stark example of this as Patrick becomes more and more unhinged and the violence starts coming fast and strong in the final third.