1. "'Science can't tell us how to be moral,'

File: rvu0DIG.jpg (343KB, 1052x1408px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 1052x1408px

>>8427232
>2. How do you cope with the stress of keeping up with the Joneses in terms of reading about boring shit you wouldn't normally care about but you are told you have to care about? E.g., Greeks, continental philosophy, fiction (particularly the western canon etc.)
>reading to impress others
>having such shit taste

>>8427232

>Is it because it is not conducive to self congratulatory mental masturbation?

>Asking THIS Question on a mongolese figure weaving goat-farm
>the year of your lord
>2K16

https://orthosphere.wordpress.com/2013/03/04/the-argument-from-truth/

>>8427259
>the giant invisible man in the sky

>>8427232
>people like OP ridicule philosophy by sarcastically and ironically parroting "can't know nuffin'!"
>when philosophy attempts to respond, e.g. to the trilemma, people like OP seriously respond "but you can't know nuffin'"

>>8427291
but you can't know nuffin

>>8427298
if i could have the munchhausen trilemma poster executed i unironically and honestly think i would

>>8427306
but u cant know if u wud
u cant know nuffin

>>8427232
>I agree, but why the hell do people who say this try to imply that philosophy can figure out objectively correct morals?
This isn't always implied. You know, there is a huge portion of philosophy that treats ideas as members rooted in perspectives and not like Plato's forms i.e. of some truer or "objective" substance.

>How do you cope with the stress of keeping up with the Joneses in terms of reading about boring shit you wouldn't normally care about but you are told you have to care about? E.g., Greeks, continental philosophy, fiction (particularly the western canon etc.)
"stress" lol. What shit fucking taste you have.

>>8427232
>I agree, but why the hell do people who say this try to imply that philosophy can figure out objectively correct morals?

Moral relativism and nihilism are just as much philosophical positions as realism.

>>8427232

1. Philosophy majors can ignore all Jews unlike every other major.
Also philosophers don't beloved in morality like scientists do because our mode of thought isn't haunted by the Christ cuck spectre
>Do science for the good of all man kind
>Oh these iq tests don't match the real narrative they aren't scientific :^)
>Everyone at the LHC thinks brexit is evil!


2.
>Plato
>Kant
>Hegel and schoppy
>Stirner
>Nietzsche
>Heidegger
>Deluze
>Land
Finished

Hey guys, OP here...here to teĺl you I'm not for real, this is just a prank for my channel on youtube, you can see my friend over there with the camera, see him? Lol. Just wanna know if it's OK with you guys if I upload it to my channel?

>>8427232
To answer questions 2.

I'm genuinely interested in this stuff. Probably because I'm a stemfag who has a normal job; I'm just able to delve into muh philosophical novels for enjoyment.

>>8427933
>Deleuze wasn't a jew so /pol/ should read him


boy oh boy that will be a fun ride