>Star attraction, movie premieres, sports events, red carpets and gala openings: the eternal war between depth and appearances. But there is no war at all between them, since the purpose of depth is to create a stronger, and thus more beautiful, appearance; to transform itself into appearance. Those who scorn appearances and evangelize depth are precisely those who are incapable of much, if any, depth: the pseudo-intellectuals, which is why it is by no means an accident that all of them are ugly.
>340. Betas follow rules. Alphas make the rules. Sigmas laugh at rules. It is clear which group the philosopher belongs in, and in which he'd like to belong.
>>8417239
We all know that's not Nietzsche.
That is one of the issues I see often in the US and Europe though. With big budget, blockbuster creations came reactionary movements that hated the emphasis on appearance in those grander works.
But it's all a matter of ego / spirit; someone with a healthy ego averts their gaze outwardly, beyond themselves and into the world of appearances, while someone with a weak ego, overly focused on themselves, is still looking for things that are "deep" in order to justify themselves.
>>8419254
>sophistry
If that's what you'd like to call perspectives opposite of your own, fine.