>Zizek responded to an /r/GamerGhazi post >Now he's

>>8408676
prove it

Some brave Twitter soul is going to have to take the plunge and link him here.

Honestly I think he'd love /lit/, not even memeing. I think he would appreciate our discourse, our dialectic, and not just because we like to post him a lot.

>>8408684
/r/GamerGhazi:

http://thephilosophicalsalon.com/a-reply-to-my-critics/#_edn4

One of the twitter people he singled out went through and annotated his essay:

http://genius.it/10242802/thephilosophicalsalon.com/reply-to-my-critics-part-two

>>8408689
I think he would prefer /pol/

>>8408694
/pol/ doesn't read, though, except for the handful of them who in recent months have been plowing through The Art of the Deal.

>implying he isn't already here

Hi

*sniff*

File: 1467242137790.png (163KB, 1881x569px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1881x569px

I wanna know his thoughts on Stirner, so yes.

>>8408676
he wont show up as he cant sneeze into his fingers every sentence.

>>8408694
He does post on leftypol

>>8409073
Proof?

>>8408676
I would like to hear a Zizekism on how the very concept of a him posting on an anonymous image board is pure ideology or something like that. Even if he, Zizek, sits at a computer and types in a message and a captcha, the message is from anonymous.

That said anonymous is a non entity, I cannot sincerely say something like "hey anon!" and every anonymous to go "are they actually talking to me?" or respond to it as an identity. It must at least be qualified I think. However if Zizek posted and I were to say "Aha! Hello you Slovenian scoundrel!" and he were to be flustered and in some way respond so as to say "yes that is my identity" then surely that is Zizek.

>>8409089
He posts all the time, go there yourself

>>8409163
So you have no proof

hes really making bread in his second reply. after the twitter crap he gets to some to-the-point psychoanalytic theory that's pretty rare from him, especially in articles

File: @!1.jpg (8KB, 284x177px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 284x177px

>>8409174
I was already posting about pure ideology all of the time.

>>8410473
>thats pretty rare from him

Maybe you have only read his later works in which he examines social and political phenomenons?

I think it's actually pretty cool for a philosopher to go and 'leave the ivory tower', check what the 'normal' world is doing with his thought and then to try and respond to that. It's something you don't see at all with modern authors or philosophers.

File: Pepe redeemed.png (439KB, 496x641px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 496x641px

>>8408676

We have enough shitposting here already, fanks.

>>8410632
>It's something you don't see at all with modern authors
https://www.youtube.com/user/vlogbrothers/featured

>>8410636
He said authors.

>>8410636
Yes, but John Green isn't an author or philosopher, he's a 'youtube celebrity' who cranks out some shitty YA now and then

He's a nobody outside the US

>>8410648
Furthermore, I don't think Green actually interacts with his critics or their thought on his work, as evidenced by him basically writing the same book over and over

Despite all the love for zizek, and I count myself as someone who likes hi,, I have to lol at the guy complaining about sarcasm / short points* when his literal trick is to string together 10 million completely interchangeable non-sequiturs. And he's a continental who only talks BS anyway. This is all just a lefty turf war so they can jostle for the most prestigious critiquing spot. So when Elon Musk makes solar powered batteries ubiquitous and cures cancer everyone can hear Zizek say, "*sniff* Aah, but if a poor Indian doesn't have solar power than Marx was right, capitalism is heading towards crisis!"

Genuinely fucking lol at critiquers.

* I haven't checked to see whether they're substantial or genuinely shit

>>8410653
>the guy who makes solar cars for rich guys from Silicon Valley will cure cancer

all this ideology *sniff*

>>8410653
>>8410656
You might be joking but I'm actually taken aback a little by the sheer ideology of that post.

Im pretty sure the Ziz probably lurks here every so often.

I bet he lurks /tv/ too.

I bet he would never do an AMA on 4chan becuase people are so skeptical these days, and they shit post, and the discussion would be nothing but memes which he probably loathes.

>>8410647
that'sthejoke.jpg

>>8410674
And not to mention all the news stories of "Slavoj Zizek posts on fascist neo-nazi imageboard" that will sure help his career.

>>8408676
Why is he becoming reactionary now?

He used to be a good voice for the left, but now he just bashes migrants and makes jokes about misogyny.

>>8410690
He's already said he wants his academic bio to say he looks at child porn, the man is beyond teflon.

>>8410661
There are still rich seams of ideology to mine. Now more than ever.

>>8408694
>I think he would prefer /pol/
This. Him and his favourite colleagues are obviously master literary shitposters, he'd have no interest in watching undergraduate open mic night. Now /pol/ on the other hand is an ideology factory ripe with possibility of edgy interpretation.

>>8410707
>He's already said he wants his academic bio to say he looks at child porn
well why the fuck is he on reddit then?
get that man over here post haste
Im not really a veteran of 4chan but i've never heard of an AMA on here thats been plagued with CP.

>>8410752
He isn't posting on reddit, he just reads it. Presumably because he googles himself and reddit pops up in the results. No doubt he reads here sometimes too.

>>8410650
What's there to even say about it? It's softcore porn for teenage girls.

File: 1470931539407.png (240KB, 695x572px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 695x572px

>>8410636
>unironically linking John Green in an argument

>>8410636
john green isn't good enough to be in the ivory tower

>>8410844
>unironically