Does it surprise you that environmentalist literature isn't a bit more fashionable nowadays?
The ways in which we're fucking the planet are many and varied. This isn't a secret, everyone is at least vaguely aware of it, but we don't particularly care. We can see the cliff edge and we're apathetically plodding on towards it.
I can understand why romantic depictions of the natural world such as those of the transcendentalists might be seen as a bit corny today. But do you think we'll see a more pragmatic style of environmentalism in art and literature in the near future?
>>8400568
By the time we're in deep enough shit to start caring, art will be a luxury that few can afford
>>8400568
>the environment
too spooky
>>8400568
No because this ge faggots is too self absorbed to care about anything except in passing so that they can be seen "caring" and never actually have to commit in any way.
>>8400611
generation of faggots*