>philosophical problems are misunderstandings of language
How do people actually believe this shit? It's obvious that any kind of philosophy involves unempirical assumptions.
Is this pasta? I swear I've seen this post before
Anyway. What is a decent Wittgenstein book to start with?
>>8397961
I started with Tractatus, haven't moved on from there yet. Gonna read PI next.
Anyway it was fine to read, though I did read "The Logic Manual" and "Language, Truth and Logic" first.
Tangential but I'd rec "Goedel's Proof" by Nagel and Newman w.r.t logic in general
>Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.
Is this supposed to be profound? If you can't speak of something you're gonna be silent of it anyway. What a dumb sentence.