I think that continental philosophy is better than analytical.

CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH? CAN YOU PROVE THAT USING MATH?

>>8387051
Better at what?

>>8387051
I disagree. You actually have to read some analytic philosophy past the positivists to hold a valid opinion

Continentals have analytical pretensions and fail. The new Ubermensch combines both.

That said, ANYONE who builds ethical systems with analytic formulas deserves death

>>8387051
agree

>>8387101
Also beware the possibility of Analyticism turning you into a soulless autist. Another reason to delve into each.

Kant was right. Equivocation really is the cancer killing philosophy.

File: 1464770846345.png (219KB, 526x391px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 526x391px

>>8387051
The analytics are using far superior methods that appeal to clarity and precision. The Continentals can't justify their methods outside of "because it's cool" or "because it's politically useful".