I'm a plebeian who has neglected books for too long and wants to start reading frequently. I already have plenty of the classics and usual recommendations ready to go but was wondering if it's advised to begin with more entry level, easily digestible material and if so, which ones are recommended?
I don't want to jump too deep into the patrician end and find myself deterred or simply failing to understand much of the work. Is this even a thing that happens to prospective readers or should I just shut up and pick up whatever takes my fancy?
Yes, Yes, Yes.
Just start reading anything reasonably important that also catches your eye, so that it's easy to get through and then you feel like you're making progress once you do
Seriously, just pick anything that sounds neat and isn't ultra-high concept, but is also famous enough to make you feel like "yeah I'm doing this!" when you're done. Try some 19th century realism or naturalism. Try Stendhal or Dickens
Okay, thanks. I have every book in the image above and a fair amount of Dickens' work too, so I'll start there.
>>8330225
You can do what >>8330708 said, also look up Le Monde's 100 books of the century https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Monde%27s_100_Books_of_the_Century
Just pick whatever book catches your eye, build up that reading stamina, and when you feel ready tackle heavier books. Just try to not read garbage
http://www.bookspot.com/listmodern100.htm
Modern Library Editors list.
>>8330708
>15 years ago
Sup gramps
>>8330719
>ranked by a French