I write like I'm stuck in a 19th C absurdist novel, but not the talented kind. I'm prosey, but not good enough to get away with it. I get carried away, disrespect plot and characters, become philosophical at the switch of a hat, and never finish my projects because they burn out after a few pages. I'm young, young enough not to damn myself totally, but old enough to know better by know.
How do I write better /lit/? Writing every day only seems to cement bad habits. What are the best books on writing? Who are the most modern authors with the cleanest prose? I feel like I need to declutter my mind, there are things I want to say, but I'm tripping up on the worser ways to speak them. Should I just become a Hemmingway-lite? Saying half and trying to mean double?
What books changed the way you thought about authorship?
>>8317766
Find and join a writing group/workshop. It really does help. Also, practice more and go into the critique threads with every new things you write.
>>8317766
>Saying half and trying to mean double
Might be good practise, but only practise. Otherwise you're almost asking to be misunderstood or not at all.
Have you tried reading/writing poetry? It might help you condense things and build atmospheres that help your meaning get across.
>>8317766
Also the way you write makes me curious. I want to see some of this , even unfinished.
>>8317808
I've been interested in poetry for a while, and find I have a good ear for rhythm - but have to admit I'm quite intimidated by it. I've written some basic free-verse, but know really little about the subject compared to prose.
I would especially appreciate a good guide on how to write poetry, something that lays out the basic rhythm schemes and jargon, and perhaps some poets other anons dig to help guide me. I like Larkin, always thought he would've browsed this place or /pol/.
>>8317816
This is a piece I've been wrangling with over this week. I have a reasonable ending and climax in mind, but again, I feel over-ambition and a complex plot are muddying it. I'm also afraid that the tone is too classical, not real enough. What annoys me, is that there's a philosophy that I really want to communicate.
There's a few more tossed up pages if you like it, however.
>>8317843
Are you the guy who posted in the Critique thread about Barnaby waking up in a hospital room?
>>8317843
cringing so fucking hard right now
"I would advise that imaginary young man to study the classics; let him not try to be modern, because he already is; let him not try to be a man of a different epoch, to be a classical writer, because, indubitably, he cannot be this, since he is irreparably a young man of the twentieth century."
>>8317843
i really like this
>>8317949
Yes, that was another re-write and one I'm still not happy with.
I think I'm going to take a week off from writing, and just read and think. I feel like there are many things I want to communicate, but I'm not taking the time to properly and lucidly form them.
>>8317827
Stephen Fry's "The Ode Less Travelled" is something I've been meaning to read; it seems to be almost a poetry textbook.
Also you may be interested in Colridge's "Biographia Literaria".
As for poets, I enjoyed what Coleridge I've read. At the moment I'm reading Mallarme, Rimbaud, Baudelaire, MacNiece, and Auden. Oh and I read Gaudete by Ted Hughes - his style is unique and fantastically vivid.
>>8319094
Cool. Just keep in mind my other critique then. Good luck.