When pointing out a source in a page of a book (in the form of

>>8312062

https://owl.english.purdue (dot) edu/owl/

If using Chicago follow http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html

If Chicago, you only do the full citation the first time, and then a different format in the bibliography

File: footer.png (12KB, 585x89px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 585x89px

>>8312077
>>8312082
I'm writing for the first time. I have no ideia what APA or Chicago is.

pic related is what I have.

>>8312062
English professor here.

For your specific question, the first way, with pages last.

But you've got a number of other errors of form in your examples.

APA, Chicago and (an important one not mentioned) MLA are style sheets for academic publishing that set the rules for this sort of thing. Google them and find sites that will give examples of proper form.

>>8312113
What errors are in this picture >>8312101 ?

What if I have a quote from the same author, in the same book, but in another chapter/section? Can I use ibid or idem?

>>8312122
Not that guy, but you don't have to cite section or chapter unless in special situations. Your job is to give people the basic information they need to look up your reference. If you're giving a page number, it's fine.

I would only cite sections/passages in cases where it's really famous and traditionally divided into sections, especially if there are many different translations of it. Or if the section is really relevant to the citation.

I am writing an essay right now where I cited sections of Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit (but still gave the translation I'm working from, in the first citation), and I just cite sections, because they're uniform across translations. But I'm also citing from an anthology of Foucault's essays, and I'm not bothering to cite from individual essays, just giving page numbers as if it's a single book.

Again the idea isn't to be exhaustive, it's to let people check your sources.

>>8312153
So I don't need to put the Sections, Chapters, etc. in it? Do I keep that to the bibliography?

Can I just put
Ludwig Von Mises, “Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis” (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1962) p. 113 ?

>>8312170
Seems like it, though because it's a book, the title would be in italics and not quotes. Articles go in quotes.

One author
First citation: Michael Pollan, [i]The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals[/i] (New York: Penguin, 2006), 99–100.
Subsequent citations: Pollan, Omnivore’s Dilemma, 3.

Bibliography: Pollan, Michael. [i]The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals.[/i] New York: Penguin, 2006.

File: chicago.png (7KB, 604x80px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 604x80px

>>8312185
I got this now.

>>8312185
Oh, and by the way, do I use "" or «» to refer to specific terms? For example: "praxeology" or «praxeology»? Or do I only use the latter "" symbols on the footnotes (since I intend on using those smaller-font text boxes for quotes in the main text)?