Is there a community book rating service where you can filter the ratings by age and sex.
I like to use the internet for recommendations, but in all the places I know the "best book ev0r" might be voted there mostly by 15-20 females.
This is an idea only lit would get behind
>>8311627
Don't forget race and socio-economic status.
We should be able to filter what appeals to the tastes of women, blacks, young people and the poor.
>>8311634
No need to be that specific. I was already anti discriminatory when I suggested complicated filters when in my educated opinion just filtering out women votes or teen votes would be enough.
>>8311645
Well those people's tastes are utter shit so I don't see why you wouldn't embrace it
>>8311656
>>8311645
You're simply not taking it far enough
>>8311627
eh, let's not devolve to memes, but it's an actually legit idea.
I mean if you google shit, it's mostly popular stuff that's being popular for the raging fans (mostly teens / fangirls / what have you). This is not only a problem for literature.
Many things that are good are being hidden under countless poor shit that the masses and the vocal enjoy.
>>8311661
I am not an activist. None of the readers are. Having a filter to exclude teen girl votes in community voting sites would not be the first step toward yearning another holocaust that supposedly didn't even happen.