>So is there any other female even close to her level of writing?

File: meow.gif (875KB, 375x209px) Image search: [Google]

875KB, 375x209px

>>8290925
When I'm asked about female writers and all i can say is VW, I feel it's kinda wannabe, because there are obviously more female writes than her. But once I go, think about it and reread such a masterpiece like the waves, I remember why she gets all the credit. So, in response to your questions, I have to add this ¿is literature really for women?

Austen and Rossetti are god tier and, in america, the best female writers are Dickinson and Henry James.
Never cared for Woolf tbqh, her works are full of vulgar cliches

>>8290925
Lear how to greentext woolfposter

>>8291260
>James
>female

File: fuckyou.gif (2MB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 256x256px

>>8291260
You dickhead are surely the type of pseudo-intellectual who has barely read some Twilight and that sort of shit. Haven't you considered that the things you see as clichés in her work were originally created by her, and copied by the "writers" you share Facebook images about?

>>8291260
>henry james
w-what

File: 1513515.jpg (76KB, 450x338px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 450x338px

>mfw I found out Woolf and Katherine Mansfield wrote to eat other shyly expressing their love for each others works

cute asf

File: 1467177107125.jpg (14KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 300x300px

Betty Smith might not have incredible prose but she's an extremely good story teller. Check her out.

Flannery "burn in hell" O'Connor

>>8291329
>Haven't you considered that the things you see as clichés in her work were originally created by her,
This is the response I get every time I point out cliches in a writer's work. Read more and you'll see that she's anything but original. Austen is actually far more original.

>>8291260
>Woolf
>vulgar clichés
literal fighting words

anyways, George Eliot is God-tier as well as >>8291501

>>8290925
>female
>her
Ooh funny op

>>8291260
>henry james
i chuckled