>see book by AC Grayling
>it's a collection of many short essays on different subjects
>pretty much every one is "dis famous philosopher thought that because he was Christian, the other thought that because he was an idealist"
>Grayling sets up the obvious questions in each topic that any layman could ask
>offers zero insight and zero examples of non trivial reasoning
This is just sad. You can spend decades in Oxbridge but you still can't gain one tiny bit of non trivial reasoning ability after all that time. Philosophy is just applied common sense plus shitloads of PR to promote your particular piece of nebulous unfalsifiable assertions in the infinite miasma of possible unfalsifiable assertions.
>inb4 the pseudo intellectuals claim otherwise
>>8278311
>>the pseudo intellectuals
that's you, that is
>sullying David Starkey's good name with this tosh
>>8278454
did you see him on the telly getting interupted by some cuntlady calling him a white male? ill try and find it.
>>8278487
>cuntlady
Lad, that wasn't a woman...
It was a man, a middle class cunt who's been jailed once at that. Telling a working class homosexual born with a clubfoot and polio too, I believe, that he has privilege.
>>8278515
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cevm18cUI24&feature=youtu.be&t=410
found it. the whole thing is gold.
when that ginger lass thinks that the petition for london to leave the uk was serious, and all the boys laugh at her.