From a stirnerist point of view, how should I think of dead people?

Motivational spooks?

(excuse the bluntness)

They are useful, in the sense that they left behind memories and artifacts which can be useful and/or pleasant to you.

is there a writer that expanded more on the concept of spooks? I'm using spooks as a sort of placeholder word for the several facets of existence/society that we're forced to want inherently through the subtle oppression of societal obligation rather than our own volition

File: visible disgust.jpg (553KB, 1273x2097px) Image search: [Google]

553KB, 1273x2097px

>>8258148

>>8258127
You aren't spooked for mourning the dead. Elephants mourn their dead.

>>8258127
>how should I
No oughts. Stirner is not prescriptive.

>>8258148
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrownness

>>8258148
Rosseau maybe?

That's just a fucking spook dude

>>8258188

see this
>>8258286

If they're gosts then they're spooks.