I'm a subvocalizing pleb who wants to improve. Any speed

Dunno where this subvocalization meme started, but if you are trying to skim through books just use your finger and start using it as a guide to build up speed.

I just sincerely hope you are not doing this on actual literature.

File: 1462633486157.png (866KB, 900x702px) Image search: [Google]

866KB, 900x702px

>wanting to take most of the pleasure and aesthetic beauty out of reading because of a meme

Guys, I just want to make the most of my ever shrinking free time.
Anything faster than subvocalization equals loss of comprehension?

>>8156080

You lose the subtler aspects of literature. If you are reading a text book or a self-help one, fine, but if you are doing this with a novel or a poem, you are basically skimming over a lot of the art in it.

noopept

>>8156066
It is possible to read too slowly.

I think 300-400 wpm is a good pace though

>>8156050
I'm a nonwiping pleb who wants to improve.
Any butt wiping resources recomendation? Books, software etc.

File: aviddreader.png (302KB, 1724x731px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 1724x731px

>>8156050

File: 1463103390350.jpg (10KB, 207x183px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 207x183px

>>8156174
hahaha is this the birth of a new meme, m'lord?
pretty funny

>>8156178

I thought this was going to be a meme, but it was actual not fully retarded.

Color me amazed.

>>8156171
But op was specifically talking about reading without subvocalizing, which is autistic as fuck for literature