What are some good reads about libertarianism and the natural

>>8093544
>natural rights

Atlas Shrugged

>>8093544
Yeah there's a lot of great books written about poorly emotionally developed people projecting their insecurities onto whacky political beliefs

libertarianism is okay but natural rights are a spook tbhfam

>>8093544
Kropotkin

File: You belong to me.jpg (62KB, 720x616px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 720x616px

>>8093544

>Rights
>Existing

>>8093550
The State and the Revolution is a good example.

>>8093566
speaking of which, read stirner OP. I guarantee you'll like him & it'll help you out with your libertarian phase.

File: moon_and_earth_lroearthrise_frame_0.jpg (373KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

373KB, 1920x1080px

The Moon is a Harsh Mistress

File: 1445544030293.png (598KB, 946x1680px) Image search: [Google]

598KB, 946x1680px

American individualist anarchists like Benjamin Tucker and Lysander Spooner are pretty interesting.
You should keep in mind these thinkers understood themselves as socialists and were decidedly anti-capitalist or you'll end up with the stale meme known as "anarcho"-capitalism.

>>8093544
Neo-reactionaries are merely libertarians who are honest enough to accept the logical conclusion of their ideology; that is neo-feudalism and getting cucked by capitalist pseudo-aristocrats for all eternity.

>>8093615

Who's talking about Neo-Reactionaries?

And Reactionaries are stupid, stop lusting after bourgeois residues.

Evolian Traditionalists represent.

>>8093615
Nrx alt-right cucks are statist collectivists like far left communists

File: image.jpg (17KB, 195x292px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 195x292px

>>8093615
This book marks the breaking point between libertarianism and Neo-reaction. Definitely more influential than most people realise, specially among sillicon valley autists who dream of reigning forever as deathless transhuman God kings.

>>8093608
Not OP. I recognize that anarcho-capitalism is a stale meme, but it's not nearly as much of a meme as Bakunin's """stateless""" socialism or Kropotkin's 'communism as """anarchism"""'. Proudhon did nothing wrong.

>>8093635
Nrx emerged from the Anglo libertarian/capitalist circles rather than from the new right European traditionalism of Guenon/Dugin/Evola etc.

>>8093544
Rand, Friedman, and Rothbard are essential for the strong, rugged individualist who don't need no state.

>>8093637
Hoppe is the first notable "right-libertarian" to admit that he was actually a feudalist the whole time, and that all the stuff about "liberty" and "voluntaryism" and the "non-aggression principle" was a crock of shit.

>>8093615
I respect their batshittert in the same way I respect radical traditionalist. They've stopped lying that their ideology is going to benefit anybody but a tiny elite. I disagree with all their views but I will always respect them more than any limpwristed "alt-right" pansie like Milo or Molyneux.

>>8093575
Read this book and absolutely loved it a while ago.

>>8093640
Mutualism is socialism with markets and banks.

File: 150710151724-ted-cruz-book-780x439.jpg (207KB, 780x439px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 780x439px

>>8093544

File: bigolcloudaweedsmoke.jpg (94KB, 806x1007px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 806x1007px

>>8093615
>>8093635
>>8093637
>>8093700
NRx isn't monarchist
nor do they make suggestions on how society should be run
read your Land b/c I'm sick of explaining this every time

File: image.png (37KB, 870x545px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 870x545px

>natural rights

>>8094002
>NRx isn't monarchist
Yes it is.

>>8093728
Nice nose, faggot

>>8094017
when has Land or Moldbug advocated monarchy?