Speed reading, I have two nieces aged five and six. What literature

>>8058442
waaaaaaaaaay too early, they can barely read with subvocalization

around 12 would be best

>>8058442
foreign movies/series w/ subtitles tbqh

>>8058447
Alright, six and seven years to go then.

Since this thread is up anyway I'll ask here, I figure phonics and pronunciation are more age appropriate subjects to work on. Is there a proven system anyone on /lit/ can recommend, preferably something that expands vocabulary as well.

>>8058455
I'll try that, no anime though. Don't want a pair of naruto weebs on my hands.

>>8058464
anime is bad either way because retard weebs with brain damage are the ones who fansub it in broken english in the first place, and it would only be detrimental for kids who are still learning language.

best to stick with things for which official subtitles exist, or whick legit sites like addic7ed are covering.

>>>/wsr/

Just introduce them to good childrens literature.

Speed reading is just technique + practice.
Practice comes from reading, technique is something to teach them later.

File: a book made for OP.jpg (34KB, 361x499px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 361x499px

>>8058442
I'm not sure what the best books for this task would be, but I have the perfect guide for you!

>>8058477
>mfw didn't even know this board existed

>>8058482
What would you recommend?

>>8058485
I might actually check that out.

>>8058495
Watership down
Plague dogs
Of Mice and men

>>8058506
Yeah I don't want to scare the shit out of them.

>>8058512
It isn't scary, just sad

>>8058517
I remembering watching plague dogs as a child and I don't think it's something my nieces would enjoy a great deal.

>>8058521
Plague dogs novels has a good ending because the publisher was no hardcore sadist

>>8058523
I'll check them out then, instilling a good sense of moral relativity into them early on is probably a good idea.

>>8058442

Somehow, placing a caption on this particular image is much worse than for most related situations where a picture suffices. "Explaining the joke" is much worse this time around, and it doesn't seem to have been done for a subtle double-reverse troll effect.

I think it's because of the obvious simplicity of what the picture had already said, without words. A kid can understand the image. So adding the caption not only suggests that the person who did it is very dumb, but it makes us feel dumber too for having read it.

>>8058442
Speed reading is a gimmick, you don't fully digest it.