do you think art should be accessible for the working class or

Art should be pursued by the spirited and spirit should be accessible to all mankind equally

art being inaccessible is usually just the result of the "masses'" own inherent ignorance and disinterest in anything artistic rather than a forced active agenda by any "elites"

File: prolife.gif (426B, 24x24px) Image search: [Google]

426B, 24x24px

only aurtists actively think about being aurtistic enough 4 the whole world 2 see like the little faglord aurtists they are

File: 151710419.jpg (844KB, 2048x1364px) Image search: [Google]

844KB, 2048x1364px

>>8033267
You say that like the upper class today are at all particularly intellectually impressive

The working class are my pen nib

>>8033538
this

>>8033267
abolish life/art distinction. 'art' as a distinct concept is a product of alienation, a label used to neutralise living cultural expression. Every museum is a graveyard

File: ruffruff.gif (603KB, 605x490px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 605x490px

>>8033655
I like museums

>>8033655
marinetti pls go

>>8033538
This. Maybe the division could be made 80-100 years ago, but ever since universal suffrage, leaders are plebeians and plebeians are leaders.

>>8033538
Politicians are the low-lifes of the upper classes. They're what divorce lawyers and breast-implant specialists are to the upper-middle class. They've got the money and the status but they're by no means the better representatives.

>>8033801
fuck the politicians lmao.

the problem is in neoliberalism in general.
classes aren't divided by anything except sheer net worth.

that's a fucking terrible world order.

>>8034090
It should go by how much pussy you slay

>>8033274
First post best post

>>8033538
they may look goofy, but british politicians are educated from childhood in elite institutions where they learn about Latin, patrician literature, satanic occult practices and all sorts deviant sex acts

>>8033274
/thread/

>>8033655
I like graveyards

>>8033281
Yeah but why are the masses disinterested? Maybe it's because it appears as a something that is useless to pursue, as their need are more "immediate"?

>>8034191
Because time is limited. There's a reason why historically, the wealthy pursued the arts. When you have money you have all of the time in the world.

File: 1432579283633.png (161KB, 500x361px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 500x361px

>>8033527
>typing numbers in place of words
Fucking kill yourself.

The working class doesn't deserve the same privileges that the higher classes have.

File: The_Victory_of_Buddha.jpg (218KB, 714x1024px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 714x1024px

Both! It should offer depth to those who seek it and still be enjoyable to those who don't, it should be a start point to those that are beginning and a returning point to those already on their way. Greatness must be apparent to everyone, otherwise it's a misnomer. Anything else is laziness.

>>8033274
Fuck art lets live.