There are two types of smart people. Those that realise the implications of relativism / Stirner / Munchhausen trilemma and admit it, and those who realise it and ignore it (those who don't realise it are dumb).
People who ignore it are usually navel gazing, house of card building, obscurantist, pretentious charlatans / academics. Most people who admit it aren't even involved in philosophy. A few people who admit it, such as myself, point out how all talk of ethics, metaphysics, etc is based on feelings and has nothing non-trivial to tell us.
Of course religionfags and philosophyfags try their hard to associate themselves with things of people who are seen as respectable or intelligent or other things. So they will lie and dissemble, all out of self interest.
I was 19 once too.
dude shut the fuck up read the collapse of the fact value dichotomy you fucking logical positivist neckbeard
>>8005218
You're a knob. Metaphysics is the admission that humans cannot directly observe every phenomena in the universe yet attempt to figure out how it works anyway using conjecture and logic. Atoms come from Epicurean metaphysics. Wittgenstein in his non-metaphysics metaphysics may have figured out the reason for language, which has stumped AI scientists as long as they've existed.
>>8005227
hi, I am an objective third party. your post is also super dumb, just so you know.
When did Munchhausen become a meme
>>8005218
>all talk of ethics, metaphysics, etc is based on feelings and has nothing non-trivial to tell us.
>feelings are trivial
How's that?
Sure, m8, let's say that's true.
Now what?
>MMXVI
>still thinking there's anything illogical or disdainable about emotion
>>8005218
>all talk of ethics, metaphysics, etc is based on feelings
lmao. have a good day chap.
Now all these people are countering with the exact same sophistry that OP pointed out