Would /lit/ please tell me whether Sartre's Nausea is usually hard to read? I'm three pages in, and confused as all hell. And I don't mean "This character's motivation's confuse me", or "This plot is hard to follow.", I mean "I understand most of these words, but they don't seem to be combining into any kind of meaningful whole, and I can't visualise what's going on, because I have no idea what is."
I don't remember it being too difficult, you're only three pages in so just keep reading. Maybe try a secondary source like Wikipedia or sparknotes to get a better grasp on the some of the basics like plot, theme, philosophical background, and so on
>>7994586
First few pages are slightly disorienting. In all it's not that hard at all.
>>7994586
It's very easy to read you are just a cretin
>>7994586
Bruh you're three pages in. Just keep going, and if you're still confused like 20 pages in, check out the Wikipedia page or something.