Post books for men. I've had enough of the touchy feely

>>7897360
pretty much all the good ones

>>7897360
Updike, Rabbit Run
Melville, Moby-Dick
Chandler, The Big Sleep

File: iink.jpg (171KB, 1500x933px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1500x933px

Cannery Row- steinbeck

Perks of being a wallflower. I dont subscribe your BINARY definition of masculinity, shitlord.

but how can a book written by a man be more manly than another?

>>7897360
Anything by Cormac McCarthy, especially The Road
>those father/son feels

>>7897360
Pretty much anything written before like 1600 was intended for a male audience.

>>7897847

Because of its contents, dumb dumb.

>>7897360
hahaha senpai don't shoot yourself with a shotgun on the way out hahahaa

File: 16161116161.jpg (137KB, 969x467px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 969x467px

>I've had enough of the touchy feely nancy boy crap

File: PHC.jpg (47KB, 310x500px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 310x500px

Pale Horse Coming. This is a book for men. Most Hunter books are, though.

Bukowski, anything

Hemingway

>>7899981
bukowski is for children thou

>>7897814
this

>>7898627
and this

i consider myself masculine but manly men shit never interested me. grow some taste fags

Homer

Fucking Homer

The alphabet of Manliness

Jack London

Ancient Germanic poetry, from back when poetry was as manly as the great and devastating feats it depicted. But of course that kind of poetry provides only a limited sort of beauty, more limited than that which modern 'nancy'-ish poetry. Still, it's fun stuff.

>>7897360
It's historical fiction, but Bernard Cornwell's Saxon Series is pretty lit familia