Thoughts? I've only read the first chapter so far but

>>7865068

Are you reading it for uni?
It's useful but not very exciting.
Eagleton forces his Marxist views in an annoying manner.

The first chapter is the best thing about it. Theory is bad, an intellectual fad of the late 20th c thats unfortunately still stinking up universities with profs whove been teaching it for so long and dont want to let go. eagleton himself abandoned it. See: after theory.

>>7865089
for me marxists are brainwashed and delusional. marxism has failed

>>7865120
I agree my man.

>>7865089
he's a marxist theorist mongoloid
what the fuck do you expect

>he's pretty good but i wish pythagoras would stop going on about triangles all the time

>>7865095
Sorry for my ignorance, but doesn't 'theory' means something general and universal and goes exactly the opposite way of a fad and such?

>>7865138

Your mum is pretty good but I wish she would stop going on about my dick

>>7865089
Sort of, one of my instructors recommended it.

>>7865095
theory is literally just criticism

>>7865145
theory is codeword for white genocide.

it's being propagated by feminist and postcolonialist marxists who try to blame men and whites for everything.

it's postmodern feelings-based obscurantism designed to make the great works of white men seem like they're just all relative (any reading is as good as any other) and etc.