Are any editions of Lot 49 and Gravity's Rainbow better

Vintage for the cover

>>7863326
Gravity's Rainbow the Penguin "deluxe" edition has some typos and shit so avoid it.

C49 is fine

File: 1451272124911.jpg (40KB, 243x335px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 243x335px

make sure to get the Penguins Deluxe edition of Gravity's Rainbow. It might be a little bit more ex(pens)ive, but it's worth it, trust me. At least if you get this edition, you won't have to ask for recom(pens)e after buying it. It's a truly indis(pens)able edition because of all the corrections in it.

File: demaupassant-double.jpg (27KB, 385x264px)

27KB, 385x264px

>>7863341
>>7863342

who's right?

>>7863347
hello
>>7863342
he's memeing you
get vintage

>>7863349
>>7863342

I see. Maybe once I read the two I'll understand.

File: 1448122883742.jpg (2MB, 1222x3649px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1222x3649px

>>7863326

>>7863342
i'm stoned and this is funny as fuck

>>7863378
DUDE

>>7863379
sorry for triggering you ian
the post struck a chord with me

what about 1st eds?

are 1st eds any good (apart from as collectibles)?

>>7863341
Can you stop with this fucking meme
The recent printings of the Penguin Deluxe Edition have absolutely no typos

>>7864635
>>7864635
X>>7864635
P>>7864635
2>>7864635
Ocasión El del y>>7864667

>>7863326
Any edition of lot 49 is fine. For GR, avoid penguin's deluxe edition in case it's one of the prints with the errors and Vintage's where's waldo cover edition, because the print quality can be awful.

I got the 1995 Penguin edition and it's good.

>>7864695
well, that depens when yours was printed

>>7864695
>supporting deckled edges

You're part of the problem.

>>7864799
>Caring enough about deckled edges to boycott them
You're part of the autism.

File: trashcan-on-fire.jpg (481KB, 1597x1600px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 1597x1600px

>>7863326
this one

I want to fucka. Girl