Friendly reminder that if you read less than a book a week

Friendly reminder that if you read a book for prestige, factual knowledge, or for entertainment, you are not a reader.

>>7746470
Reader is someone who reads, therefore someone who reads for X reasons is still a reader.

File: 8e6de6d7753a95786d5439923f28916d.jpg (26KB, 388x432px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 388x432px

good thing i'm a writer then

>>7746515
Writers who don't read don't make for good writers.

My ego can't cope with your standards.

Reminder if you read you're not a reader.

>>7746539
let me fix that:
writer's who don't write don't make for good writers

>>7746548
>Delusional
>Cringe

>>7746548
>there are people, even on /lit/, who unironically believe it

>>7746548
You don't unironically think you will right something of worth as someone who doesn't read, write?