After reading Foundings and Critique of Practical Reason, I have

Morality is only relevant to non-human entities insofar as they are relevant to humans.

Thats why you eat it practically

Do you personally kill your animals before you eat them? Then yeah, you might have an argument.
Do you buy your meats at the supermarket? Then no, there's nothing unethical about that because your actions change literally nothing at all.

>>7719422
except supporting the industry by providing the economic demand for it's perpetuation.

>>7719422
Your logic is riddled with as many holes in your life, poor you.

>>7719441
>mfw they're going to sell the meat whether consumers make contrived and misguided ethical choices or not, because the consumer has an artificially limited choice

>>7718720

Therefore, seriously consider abandoning any pretense to morality.

>>7719452
>mfw it's ok to beat the shit out of an anon if there are vast institutions to support it.

>>7719441
You're not directly supporting it. No one makes meat for you. You can look up how much meat is getting thrown away because it expires on the shelf.

Think of this: if you were to die tommorow, would that change the world in any way? Would they slaughter less animals because of that?

File: images (3).jpg (11KB, 512x288px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 512x288px

>>7719480
it's not ideal but we need to nationalise the supermarkets to solve the problem

>>7719480
>not realising that the point raised by >>7719452
was not whether it's moral but that it's not "perpetuating" the industry

>morals

File: 1431914857663.jpg (25KB, 600x620px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 600x620px

>>7720026
You dropped your picture, Stirner sensei