Is reading the science of logic necessary to understanding any

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 4
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
2016-02-19 07:03:27 Post No. 7715024
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: OnSycMOp.png (144KB, 309x309px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 309x309px

Anonymous 2016-02-19 07:03:27 Post No. 7715024 [Report]

Is reading the science of logic necessary to understanding any major philosopher after Hegel? Is it okay if I just read his other stuff and come back to it later?

Anonymous 2016-02-19 07:32:29 Post No.7715075
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-19 07:32:29 Post No.7715075 [Report]

>>7715024
Logic isn't a science.

Anonymous 2016-02-19 07:46:09 Post No.7715093
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-19 07:46:09 Post No.7715093 [Report]

>>7715024
From what I hear, no. It's really abstract stuff that makes Phenomenology of Spirit look easy by comparison and no one really engaged with it.

Anonymous 2016-02-19 08:45:25 Post No.7715207
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-02-19 08:45:25 Post No.7715207 [Report]

>>7715093
Hyppolite engaged with it. (The teach of Foucault, Deleuze, Derrida, etc)

Is reading the science of logic necessary to understanding any

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/