I paid 2€ for this secondhand edition of Ulysses. Printed in

>1986

probably not, sorry bud

Unlucky, you got the shitty Gabler edition- which was unanimously dropped for its numerous edits and changes to the text.

(hence the low price)

Any copy is. Good luck ever really enjoying another book though.

i like books from the 70s/80s better than new editions usually

File: IMG_20151227_165628.jpg (3MB, 2964x3998px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2964x3998px

>>7510367
Could I be wrong?

>>7510399
Thanks mate.

>>7510370
To be honest, I live in a non-English country, and I don't usually see nice books in english. Which one would be a good edition?

Honestly, unless you're an academic studying Ulysses the edition you pick doesn't really matter. The changes are lots of minor differences that you won't notice.

>>7510445
There's really only three editions, in terms of content:

1922- Original
1961-1984 Standard Edition
1984-1990 Corrected Text Gabler Edition
1990-now Standard Edition (same as before)

The corrected edition was only printed for 6 years and was hugely unpopular, by all means still read it, but you won't be reading Ulysses as Joyce wrote it.

>>7510570
So, if you have to choose between the "Original" and the "Standard", what would you say?

Thanks for the info, /lit/mate.

File: tumblr_niqzm1gGBX1rf1jvro1_1280.jpg (922KB, 1280x1734px) Image search: [Google]

922KB, 1280x1734px

I just bought the 1922 text, the Shakespeare and Co. version. That's fine, right?

Got that 1961 hardcover one from modern library. Two bucks. Not shabby.

>>7510711
Green cloth binding? I got the same one, but for ~$15. Got it "used" but it's clearly never been read, and I love those cloth modern library texts.