I keep getting called a fascist in political discussions, people

>>7399592

>>>/pol/

Heinlein.

Antiracist antisexist globalist fascism with socialistic tendencies.

>>7399592
>people call me fascist and don't tolerate my personal views
>my personal views do not tolerate some people

>>>/pol/

>>7399592
>people use the term as an accusation and as if that invalidates all my views.

eh, it's not quite that. it's not like "oh you're a fascist therefore you are obviously wrong," it's more "oh you're a fascist, engaging with you is pointless." it's not a trivial difference.

>What is some literature that displays fascism in a positive or neural light?

that's pretty hard to do explicitly. could make an argument for soumission being one.

>>7399626
The theocracy of Soumission is totalitarian but not fascist proper.

>>7399592
>What is some literature that displays fascism in a positive or neural light?
This question assumes you accept their claim that you're a Fascist. 'Fascist' is generally used as a buzzword insult, so a more effective approach might be to refer to a standard definition of Fascism and indicate how that's not you.

Unless you actually are a Fascist, of course.

Whenever anyone starts bringing in ad hominem during a discussion/debate, always ask them to define their terms and then point out how you are one. If they can't then their point is invalid. Also point out that it's an ad hominem, but that's a given of course.

>>7399698
In my country a fascist is defined as anybody who disagrees with me
According to the youtube videos I watched a fascist means anybody who is racist
What is a good book to define all the "isms" accurately, without just comparing things the author doesn't like to Nazis?

>>7399721
>What is a good book to define all the "isms" accurately

if you need such a thing, i would find another field of interest.

>>7399620
>Antiracist
>Fascism
lmao

>>7399736
>globalism

Even I haven't read him, but the post is strongly insinuating a world-wide state rather than a regional one. So yeah, it would actually be vehemently anti-racist because your race identity would contravene with the state identity of a world member.

>>7399721
>What is a good book to define all the "isms" accurately
A dicitionary tbqh

>>7399736
You do realize that there were Jews, Ethiopians, and Arabs all holding positions of power alongside Italians in Fascist Italy, right? And that one of the key points of Fascism was improving humanity as a whole and progressing from being "just" Italians?

"Fascist" is now a meaningless term. It is just applied to anything vaguely racist.

Storm of Steel by Ernst Junger

>>7399776
>And that one of the key points of Fascism was improving humanity as a whole and progressing from being "just" Italians?
It's just lip service.
It's like all those quotes about Hitler respecting other races or nations that weren't Aryan but you know he wouldn't hesitate to destroy them if they got in his way.

>>7399806
>It's like all those quotes about Hitler respecting other races or nations that weren't Aryan but you know he wouldn't hesitate to destroy them if they got in his way.
Destroy them to make the world an overall better place
A small group will suffer to let humanity as a while advance

>>7399814
So it's not anti-racist,and is lip service after all, isn't it?
I don't care either way and don't really subscribe to a particular ideology but this is at least is apparent no matter what you believe about other races or whatever.

>>7399620
>>7399776
Portugal's Estado Novo is a better example. Their whole argument towards Portugal's right to hold colonies is that the Portugese were dominated by so many different cultures over the last 1500 years that they were uniquely good colonists that never created racist classifications, unlike others.

>>7399620
>antisexism
>positive

Just ask them to define fascism and that usually stumps them then and there. Then ask them what's inherently wrong with fascism if they can muster up a coherent respone.