Is "Beyond Good and Evil" a good book to start

>>7361918
start with the greeks

>>7361918
Yes. I did and it was perfectly understandable.

File: 2015-11-17 10.28.36.png (146KB, 538x466px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 538x466px

lol

File: 1447752578821.png (210KB, 538x749px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 538x749px

>>7361959

You may want to consider Human, All Too Human first - it came before Beyond Good And Evil and starts some trains of thoughts that are continued in Beyond

i started with genealogy of morals. i prefer small books.

keep in my nietz is repetitive as fuck.

File: 12207899_1644601455800478_2090751661_n.jpg (58KB, 645x960px)

58KB, 645x960px

not op but is there a guide similar to this for nietzche?

File: louvre-les-sabines.jpg (239KB, 768x580px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 768x580px

>>7361918
Start with the birth of Tragedy

>>7362181
Thanks for this!

>>7362472
no.
Art and Revolution by Wagner first, then birth of tragedy.

>>7362634
no, birth of tragedy is a good starting place.

>>7362472
Eeeh, dunno about that man. I've been reading it and, knowing about N's thought already, I see how much this book is different from the rest of his output. It's beautiful, don't get me wrong, but I wouldn't recommend it to people trying to "get" into Nietzsche, as they're probably wanting to read his more famous and mature ideas; the Birth of Tragedy would maybe mislead them.