>decide to check some literature review blogs >all are

Never read literature review blogs. Just read the books.

Why would a man read books? Isn't everyone on /lit/ female?

£decide to view the front page of /lit/
§no book threads

>>10033097
Another quality thinly veiled 'woman hate' frog thread

Why the fuck does no one on this board make threads about literature they enjoy?

>>10033105
>Why the fuck does no one on this board make threads about literature they enjoy?
That would require us to enjoy literature, though.

>>10033105
Because they're too busy memeing to actually read anything. It's too bad; I've seen plenty of promising threads with decent discussion starting up get bumped off the board in favor of more trash threads just because they were posted at a slow time of day.

>>10033105
Hey I've been making gaddis threads for the past 2 days and they get ignored or someone says "burger trash". I think the issue is you guys are fags.

>>10033097
they probably have better taste than you

>decide to study english literature at uni
>all classmates are girls
>all comments are from girls

>>10033111
>I've seen plenty of promising threads with decent discussion starting up get bumped off the board in favor of more trash threads just because they were posted at a slow time of day.
That happens with every board that isn't slow as dirt. It's just one of the downsides of imageboards.

File: Novi god.png (27KB, 144x143px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 144x143px

>>10033097
>All girls
but
>They are all fugly/old

>>10033126
True. My homeboards are /cgl/ and /toy/ so I guess I'm used to a much slower pace. Still, I also think there's a lot less shitposting on those boards--people leave shit threads like this to die after pointing to more relevant discussion elsewhere and that's that.

>>10033192
>less shitposting on those boards
What do you expect, classic literature is 90% shitting.

File: 1505403537854.gif (3MB, 498x332px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 498x332px

>>10033097
Literature is for fags so it makes sense if you ask me

>>10033097
There aren't any valuable book reviews on the interwebz, anon, only some global summaries.

>Criticism is based on the author's political views.
>Critic is a woman.

File: not amused.jpg (18KB, 371x360px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 371x360px

>>10033097
>They judge a book's quality by their characters
>Omg a rapist, therefore the book is bad!
>They judge a writer theological view by the books tragedy
>Omg she didn't stood up for herself when confronted this author is such a male supremacist!

I want to follow a review website, but those chicks make it extra-hard

>>10033105
>enjoying literature

>>10033097
Shut the FUCK up

>>10033097
i know this feel op. i wish i could find some review blogs that weren't full of womens opinions. oh well i guess they can't help that their the inferior sex

>>10033097
I hate women.

>>10033105
>reading literature you "enjoy"
Pleb.

>>10033105
He simply pointed out they were female, to hate them is up to you

>>10033116
>women
>taste

File: 1497403952821.jpg (30KB, 445x432px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 445x432px

>fictional novel written in the early 19th century
>female reviewer complains about sexism

File: 4234242.png (414KB, 489x497px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 489x497px

>>10033097
Whats she reading /lit/

>>10035614
"The Art of Facesitting"

That's right ladies. I'm a boy, AND I read. If that bothers you, fuck off.

>>10033624
Only Indian literature

File: women.jpg (955KB, 1440x1974px) Image search: [Google]

955KB, 1440x1974px

>>10033105
kill yourself white knight