Is the Oxford History of Western Philosophy a good starter into philosophy? I read that it may be extremely boring, but other than that just sparse reviews.
>>10025795
nah, not really
>>10025795
Big historical narratives like this are always useless because in trying to be objective and not forward any one perspective they end up saying next to nothing
Philosophy is not the domain for the ballsless
Start with the Greeks
>>10025795
Never heard of it. Go with Copleston, Kenney, or Durant, depending on your purposes.