Is there a "state of currently valid philosophy" like

The closest things to what you ask are in applied ethics:

https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/

But philosophy is about the questions.

>>10021655
Not really, as very little philosophy is actually used for anything. On the other hand, a properly-maintained "scientific consensus" for biology is important as it informs a lot of thought, laws/regulation and technology. So it needs to be accurate and highly scrutinised.

Really validity is a philosophical thing, you can be valid within a given path of thought and/or corresponding application but not objectively, for all.

>>10021736
t. Stemfag