Thoughts on Samuel Beckett's "trilogy?" /lit/'s praise seems to focus mostly on his plays, and I'm a little reluctant to dive into not just one but three stream-of-consciousness po-mo books.
>>10017748
They're brilliant, he basically single handedly killed the novel
they capture a certain revulsion with corporeality that i appreciate
>>10017748
You can start by reading Molloy and then take a break. It's not as heavy as the other two get, and you don't have to read them in a row.
Miles better than his terrible plays.
>>10017762
What a stupid thing to say.
They are great, a truly amazing read expecially the unnamable. There is nothing in literature that you can compare to it
>>10017762 you must be new to literature, enjoy your stay, fagget
Its better than Ulysses desu