Contemporary psychology is a disgrace. Stuck at a developmental

>defined through its usefulness
Is this necessarily bad, especially for schools focused on practical applications?
>its aversion to formulating generalised theories
Why focused on generalized theories once one recognizes neuro-divergence and the importance of individual assessment?

Moreover, could you be more specific? It's hard to understand what you're on about.

>>10014032
Shutup and read Jung faggit

A switch to idiographic methods would help, but would require retraining literally millions of retards who think quantifying observed phenomena, reifying their observer-constructed quantification data as a "structural" entity, and assuming that entity exists in itself, is science.

It's just not possible. The whole society has run amok on this materialist thinking, not just psychologists or even scientists. They don't even realise what they're doing. Guenon's The Reign of Quantity and the Sign of the Times spells it out pretty clearly. Also Dialect of Enlightenment.

A massive turn toward phenomenology and Goethe would help, but only insofar as it causes an inward, spiritual change.

>>10014063
>muh Memerson

No, they should read Spinoza.

We don't, we acknowledge Hegel finished philosophy and leave it at that.

>>10014032
>/lit/ - Literature

>>10014032
>>>/his/