isn't the ego also a spook? and what about the spook of spooks? is it all just self-contained skepticism?
>>10004645
>isn't the ego also a spook?
How can the self be subservient or bellow itself?
>spook of spooks?
What do you mean by this?
>>10004645
Just read it dummy.
The ego is the conceptualization of the self.
I.E. Who I think I am. Persona etc
it's basically everything above the extremely basic "raw experience"
>>10004676
If you can't explain or defend a concept this central to an author's work then you don't understand them.
>>10004687
It's not
it's not a spook cuz stirner doesn't define it as a spook, therefore it is not a spook. philosophy is fun LOL
>>10004682
> Who I think I am.
> implying this very idea of self-identity or persona is not a spook when everything else you think about IS a spook
wtf Max
Stirner dissolves his own superego. The real accomplishment is dissolving the ego and leaving only pure id. The ego is a spook.