What's the worst LGBT inaccuracy you've seen in a piece

>>8819393
I think that really synchronises with the widely deployed transsexual<->transvestite obfuscation. Desperate guys DO lower their gender standards, but they actually do it solidly, going for crossdressers.

File: a-filthy-lie.jpg (25KB, 500x380px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x380px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVXy6a7-JYQ

hmm..

first one is still really funny.
second one is funny.. ish...
rest is pure zombie garbage.

>beautiful trans escort would charge much higher prices than a similarly attractive cis escort

That's why you scope out weak and vulnerable feminine men to tempt onto your yacht with promises of eternal love if only they inject the estrogen. Goading them into the surgeries with classical conditioning and rote manipulation. 60k lifetime for each of them is far better rate then anything an escort would charge over that much time in service and you get the added benefit of having broken sluts with emotional issues completely reliant on you for everything. Bonus points if you hook them on addictive drugs. Only cheaper way is to go mail order brides and then you have to train them English and the ones that are just using you for a visa and all that bullshit. Tranny slaves are better even if they can't fart out a baby for you.

>>8819393
Escort, yes, because there is a limited supply of what they offer so prices go up. Also it's just sex.

For actual dating? Most guys, even liberal ones would NEVER even CONSIDER dating a transwoman. Fuck maybe. Date? Forget it.
Being a chaser means chasing after the 0.1% of the population that sates your fetish; being a straight guy willing to date trannies means dating WAY above your league.