Thread replies: 4
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: images.jpg (9KB, 300x168px) Image search:
[Google]
9KB, 300x168px
Something that's occurred to me:
1) Sex and gender aren't defined by one's secondary sexual characteristics, hormones, chromosomes, etc.
2) Sex and gender can only be defined by one's subjective opinion of what one's gender and sex is or isn't.
3) Saying that sex and gender are defined by traditional notions and constructions of sex and gender eg. women have breasts, men have penises, etc. is not only incorrect but transphobic
4) Most trans people however, want to embody the traditional notions and constructs of the gender and sex they identify with, otherwise they feel gender dysphoria
So logically, doesn't that mean that the majority of trans people, by transitioning towards traditional notions of sex and gender, are technically acting out their own internalised transphobia? If gender and sex are just a subjective opinion, then simply stating that you were Male/female/other should technically be enough, right?
>>
Good thing non-SJWs don't actually believe this senpai
>>
A lot of Leftist nonsense makes little sense.
"Cultural appropriation" is the oppressor group taking on the culture of an oppressed group. So men becoming women (trans) should be wrongful cultural appropriation right? Wrong, shitlord, logic is phallogocentric; stop using it.
>>
Mentally associating yourself with a biological sex surely means you're going to be influenced by them and want to be like them and message towards them affect you.
Isn't a transperson fitting traditional notions not transphobic (if anything it's conservative) no different to a cisperson doing the same.
Thread posts: 4
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1