I was hoping that I'd find a clear correlation between AGP

File: measure.png (48KB, 732x643px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 732x643px

My guess is that I simply measured AGP wrong. It failed to correlate with things that my usual measure correlates with in men, so I'm probably measuring something entirely different.

I wonder if this is more evidence that AGP isn't necessarily an etiology for transgenderism, the way the responses seem to be clustered. Could we get box-and-whisker plots for the AGP scale?

File: cismena_p.png (18KB, 479x438px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 479x438px

>>8802982
I think it's more likely that I'm just measuring cis women's AGP wrong. It's not even obvious that it is measurable, let alone that my way of doing it works. Several respondents also seemed confused about my wording.

I'm not sure what exactly you want me to plot. The AGP intensities for each sexual orientation?

More severe autism than Trent desu

>>8802973

>Most women are some degree of AGP
>even according to specific questions

Hmm... I guess HSTS are false trans after all.

File: transwomana_p.png (9KB, 411x434px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 411x434px

Also, for completeness, I guess I should include the responses from trans women. (Or rather, trans AMABs, because there's also tumblrgenders.)

File: transwomana_p.png (10KB, 403x429px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 403x429px

>>8803113
Wait, I did this wrong. That's the numbers for trans AFABs. Here's the ones for trans AMABs.