>tfw you believe in God but also can't see how gay love could possibly be immoral
i feel horribly conflicted
I don't want to repress everything but I know that would just end horribly, but I also don't want to defy God
anyone else in this position?
pic unrelated
>>8800190
people don't obey God because it is right, they obey God because it/they/he is powerful and disobedience means eternal suffering and hellfire
>make some humans gay
>don't want humans to be gay
pick one, god
>>8800190
If he is real, he's a sick, twisted, and vengeful god. The romans/greeks might be right.
>>8800190
>2017
>not worshiping Odin
try harder faggot
>>8800190
There is nothing in the Bible that explicitly forbids homosexuality, that's just bigots interpreting it in a way that suits their bigotry.
>I know that would just end horribly
Like how
I've been celibate for 20 years and nowhere near going nuts. I dont feel comfortable with sex and probably never will. You dont die if you dont have sex. At worst you'll feel like shit sometimes but who doesnt.
>>8800190
You had one job to breed and you blew it eh we will just steal your sperm and chop off your dick as payment cheers
>>8800390
I see you are going to make a habit of this 'doctor'.
>>8800373
The old testament specifically says men sleeping with men is a crime
>>8800402
Yes I am milking this for it's worth
>>8800190
>defy God
Why do you think God would only speak through certain people, this whole concept that some people know precisely what God says or wants is ridiculous.
>>8800190
Yeah I am. It's weird how you just can't be sure of anything right ?
>>8800417
AS. WITH. A. WOMAN. Stop erasing that part.
>>8800190
I'm a religious conservative. Also a gay male.
Sometimes there's a bit of cognitive dissonance but that mostly comes from sleeping with my boyfriend even though we aren't married.
The actual homosexuality part doesn't bother me because the anti-gay parts of the bible are wither vague and kind of "poetically" phrased or are essentially mistranslations.
>>8800919
So topping is wrong but bottoming is a-okay?
>>8800966
Well yes because they were assuming you would get with a gay prostitute and thus be topping him.
Jesus never existed. Nobody needs to be saved. You have a very short time on this earth, make the best of it and don't let people who aren't paying you or related to you tell you what to say or do.
>>8800966
No the whole of anal sex is wrong obviously. Also gay marriage. Also a man attracted to women having sex with a man. That's the minimum I can come up with.
>>8800994
None of those things are explicitly forbidden actually.
>>8801023
Come on, you can fairly easily infer it from "a man will not have sex with a man as with a woman' (or "on a woman's bed" it's actually difficult to translate). Otherwise, what would it forbid ? Gay sex in the context of idol worship ? That's a joke.
>>8801054
>Living by levitical law
Not very Christian of you.
>>8800190
HAHA
can't you interpret leviticus so it only actually forbids anal sex