why are gay guys a lot more aesthetically pleasing than the average

>>8707516
that kim guy? meh

but the billy guy below him looks sweet af

>>8707516
>dye-raped hair
>female eyes
>mutilated eyebrows
>bump infested body from manscaping
h o m o - a e s t h e t i c

He literally looks like he's made of plastic. Is that some kind of Instagram filter? The "Ken doll" filter?

But anyway, gay guys are aiming to look good for the sex which is highly visual and chooses mates based on looking sexy rather than markers of success and the ability to provide. No shit gay men are better-looking. Sorta. In theory.

>>8707516
That faggot looks ugly as fuck. The best look for a man is a handsome guy who takes care of his health and hygiene. Pretty boy faggots who doll themselves up are fucking ugly in a way that let's you know they're not just ugly outside, but they're also even uglier on the inside.

It's the "attraction to men" effect. You try to look as good as you can since you want men to find you attractive, hence they take much more care about their body and face. I have experienced this effect since I discovered my bisexuality sometime in high school.

>>8707516
Most men have this mistaken idea that not taking care of your looks is manly.

A lot of homely men could look nice if they put some effort into it.

File: 903485 copy 2.png (1MB, 926x1314px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 926x1314px

>>8707516
No gay man/anyone that fits into gay man taste looks like a man.

>>8707605
this, also why lesbians are fat and ugly

File: the truth.png (495KB, 713x423px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 713x423px

>>8707516
m8?

>>8707540

Also this.

My favorite theory is: Modern psychology considers that an overbearing mother is one of the factors that causes homosexuality, and mothers tend to take care more for their attractive children. Thus increasing the likelihood
of an attractive kid to develop homosexuality.

File: 8e1a82578a4533e82e36f61a0dec6893.jpg (69KB, 736x515px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 736x515px

>>8708450
>Modern psychology

That is ancient history.
Also psychology isn't science.

Homosexuality occurs in a fixed percentage of the population regardless of culture, hence it is a genetic mutation.

If bad parenting made gays their would be a lot more of them.

>>8708474
>Homosexuality occurs in a fixed percentage of the population regardless of culture, hence it is a genetic mutation.

Not true, I don't have the source now. But homosexuality is not evenly spread along cultures. Homosexuality is non-existent in nomad populations and it has the highest incidence among ashkenazi jews.

>>8708450
>Modern psychology
Stopped reading.

>>8708494
>Homosexuality is non-existent in nomad populations
Nomadic populations are very sparse and tend to be very conservative.
As a result there would be fewer gays and they would be far more likely to repress.
I don't think you realize how unlikely it would be for an entire section of the species to be unable to produce homosexuals.

>it has the highest incidence among ashkenazi jews.
And coincidentally Ashkenazi Jews are very irreligious and accepting towards homosexuality.

He just posted the "correlation is no causation" image and you fucking did it again bro.

File: E8660843-B6CF-4C84-B50F-36B8C68772D3-1297-0000011096761223.jpg (285KB, 640x437px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 640x437px

>>8707516
>>8708427
>gay men
>straight men
>handsome

Lol, everybody knows bi men are the hottest men, way more attractive than gay men and straight men in everystyle, masculine or feminine.

>>8708924
>Freud is so much better guise!

spot the lacancuck

>>8708994
Sluts are never attractive.

>>8708994
this is true

>>8709012
that is waht monosexuals says, until they lust for bisluts.

>>8707516
This guy probably makes the same face 90% of the time (same as most gay men).